Anonymous
Financial expert · Financer
Here's a sobering fact: in 2025, only 38% of actively managed funds survived and beat their passive counterparts, down from 42% the previous year.
Yet despite this challenging landscape, actively managed mutual funds still control trillions in assets. No, that's not a typo and you read it right. Trillions.
While passive investing has gained dominance, certain actively managed funds and categories, particularly fixed-income and real estate, continue to deliver real value.
This guide cuts through the noise with an honest, data-driven examination of actively managed mutual funds.
You'll learn when they make sense, how to evaluate them, which funds have actually delivered results, and what to watch in 2026. We'll cover the best-performing funds, explain exactly when you can buy and sell them, and show you the metrics that separate winners from losers.
Whether you're considering your first active fund or reassessing your current holdings, you'll get the straight truth about active management.
Actively managed mutual funds are pooled investment vehicles where professional fund managers actively select securities with the goal of outperforming a benchmark index like the S&P 500.
Unlike passive funds that simply track an index, active mutual funds rely on human judgment. The core premise is straightforward: fund managers use research, market forecasting, and their own expertise to decide what to buy, sell, and when.
They can adjust holdings based on market conditions, economic outlook, or company-specific research.
When you invest in an actively managed mutual fund, you pool your money with other investors, and the fund manager invests this capital across stocks, bonds, or other securities depending on the fund's objective.
These active mutual funds come in various categories: large-cap, mid-cap, small-cap equity funds, as well as fixed-income, real estate, and international funds.
The fund manager's expertise and strategy are what you're paying for, and the hope is that their skill will generate returns that exceed what a simple index fund would deliver. The debate around actively managed funds vs index funds ultimately comes down to whether that expertise justifies the higher cost.
Actively managed mutual funds are regulated by the SEC and must disclose their holdings, fees, and performance regularly. This transparency helps you evaluate whether a fund's strategy aligns with your goals and whether the manager is delivering on their promises.
The mechanics of actively managed mutual funds are different from stocks or ETFs:
Actively managed mutual funds trade once per day at the closing NAV (net asset value), calculated after markets close at 4:00 PM Eastern Time. This differs fundamentally from stocks and ETFs that trade continuously throughout the day.
The cutoff time matters:
The actual NAV calculation and trade settlement happens after market close, so you don't know the exact price when placing orders.
The T+1 settlement cycle means trades settle one business day after execution, so proceeds from sales are available the next business day.
Many funds impose short-term trading fees or redemption fees if you sell shares within 30 to 90 days to discourage market timing.
You can purchase actively managed mutual funds through brokerage accounts, directly from fund companies, or through retirement plans like 401(k)s.
Most funds have minimum initial investment requirements, typically $1,000 to $3,000, though subsequent investments may have lower or no minimums. Systematic investment plans allow automatic monthly purchases with lower minimums.
Actively managed mutual funds are best suited for long-term investors, not day traders, due to their once-daily pricing and potential redemption fees.
You can place orders online, by phone, or through financial advisors, with most major brokerages offering access to thousands of mutual funds.
Save thousands by choosing the best investment broker in 2026. Compare the options for free within minutes.
Compare investment brokers here!While most active funds underperform, a select group has consistently delivered strong results over the past 10 years.
The funds listed below represent those rare managers who have successfully beaten their benchmarks after fees, a feat achieved by roughly one out of every five active funds over the decade through 2025.
These funds span different categories and investment styles, demonstrating that active management can work when executed with discipline and skill.
Disclaimer: Past performance doesn't guarantee future results, but these funds have demonstrated consistent processes and experienced management teams worth your attention.
This balanced fund invests approximately 65% in stocks and 35% in bonds, focusing on dividend-paying large-cap companies and investment-grade bonds.
It has delivered approximately 9.75% annualized returns over the past decade with lower volatility than pure equity funds, and returned 17.74% in 2025 alone.
Established in 1929, it's one of the oldest mutual funds in existence, with an expense ratio of just 0.25% and total assets of roughly $120 billion. The fund's conservative allocation makes it suitable for investors seeking growth with downside protection.
Its long track record through multiple market cycles demonstrates the staying power of a disciplined, balanced approach.
This fund focuses on large-cap growth companies with strong competitive advantages and above-average earnings growth.
It has generated approximately 13% to 14% annualized returns over the past decade, outperforming the S&P 500 Growth Index, and posted an 18.78% return in 2025.
The fund's concentrated approach typically holds 80 to 120 positions and emphasizes quality companies in technology, healthcare, and consumer sectors.
With an expense ratio of 0.69% and net assets of approximately $69 billion, it represents one of the best actively managed mutual funds for investors seeking growth exposure with active management. The fund's willingness to concentrate in high-conviction ideas has paid off for long-term investors.
This fund targets dividend-paying stocks with attractive valuations and strong fundamentals, primarily large-cap value companies.
It has delivered approximately 11.6% annualized returns over the past five years while providing above-average dividend income, and posted a 13.89% return in 2025.
The fund's defensive positioning helped it outperform during market downturns, making it attractive for income-focused investors.
With an expense ratio of 0.45% for R6 shares and net assets of approximately $44 billion, it offers a competitive cost for active management in the income space. The fund balances capital appreciation with current income, appealing to investors nearing or in retirement.
This large-cap growth fund invests in companies the manager believes are undervalued relative to their growth potential.
It has generated approximately 12% to 13% annualized returns over the past decade, with significant positions in technology and communication services, and returned 21.75% in 2025.
Legendary manager Will Danoff has run the fund since 1990, delivering a roughly 10,500% cumulative return. Danoff announced his retirement at the end of 2026, with co-managers Asher Anolic and Jason Weiner already managing approximately 30% of the portfolio.
With an expense ratio of 0.69% and net assets of approximately $170 billion, it remains one of the largest single-manager funds in the world. The management transition is worth watching closely for current and prospective investors.
This value-oriented fund focuses on large-cap stocks trading below their intrinsic value, with a contrarian approach.
It has delivered approximately 11% to 12% annualized returns over the past decade, outperforming value benchmarks during a period when growth dominated.
The fund's patient, long-term investment approach and team-based management structure (rather than a single star manager) provide stability.
With an expense ratio of 0.51% and net assets of approximately $120 billion, it offers reasonable pricing for active value management. The fund's willingness to look different from the benchmark and hold positions for years demonstrates true active management.
This fund invests in companies with sustainable competitive advantages and strong growth characteristics, primarily in the large-cap space.
It has generated solid returns over longer periods, though its 2025 performance (13.6% YTD) lagged the large-cap growth category average.
The fund's management team, with an average tenure of nearly 7 years, brings deep sector expertise. The portfolio typically holds 40 to 60 positions, demonstrating true conviction in its best ideas rather than index-hugging behavior.
With an expense ratio of 1.02%, it's the most expensive fund on this list and worth monitoring closely to see whether its concentrated approach justifies the higher cost going forward.
These six funds share common characteristics that set them apart:
They represent the minority of active managers who have justified their fees through actual outperformance. That said, keep a close eye on management transitions. Fidelity Contrafund's upcoming leadership change in 2026 is a prime example of why ongoing monitoring matters.
Beyond established winners, several actively managed funds have demonstrated strong recent performance and compelling strategies worth monitoring in 2026.
These funds may not have full 10-year track records but show promising characteristics including innovative approaches, strong recent performance, or positioning for current market dynamics.
Several are newer active ETF structures that combine active management with ETF tax efficiency and lower costs.
This active ETF focuses on dividend-paying stocks with strong fundamentals and attractive valuations.
It offers Capital Group's institutional research capabilities (the same team behind American Funds) in a low-cost ETF wrapper with a 0.33% expense ratio.
The fund has strong positioning in financials and healthcare sectors that may benefit from 2026 economic conditions.
Capital Group's entry into the ETF space brings decades of active management experience to a more tax-efficient structure.
This fund targets small-cap value stocks with higher profitability and investment characteristics.
Its systematic active approach has outperformed traditional small-cap value indexes with strong performance in 2024 and 2025.
With an expense ratio of 0.25%, it offers active insights at near-passive pricing. Watch for continued small-cap opportunities as interest rates stabilize and smaller companies benefit from improved financing conditions.
This fund invests in high-quality growth companies with sustainable competitive advantages.
JPMorgan demonstrated strong 2024 performance across its active lineup, and this fund features a concentrated portfolio of 40 to 60 holdings.
With an expense ratio of 0.44%, it offers reasonable pricing for active growth management. The fund is positioned for companies benefiting from AI and technology transformation, themes likely to continue through 2026.
This fund uses a systematic approach to tilt toward smaller companies and value stocks while maintaining broad market exposure.
Dimensional's strong academic research foundation and consistent outperformance have built a loyal following.
With an expense ratio of just 0.17%, it offers active insights at remarkably low costs. Watch for its balance of active factor tilts with index-like diversification and pricing.
This fund leverages T. Rowe Price's extensive research team to identify undervalued stocks across all market caps.
The fund's flexible mandate and strong 2024 to 2025 performance demonstrate the value of deep research capabilities.
With an expense ratio of 0.31%, it offers competitive pricing. The fund is positioned to capitalize on market dislocations and mispriced opportunities that may arise in 2026.
This active ETF combines value factor screening with active overlay to avoid value traps.
Its concentrated portfolio typically holds 50 to 75 positions and has delivered strong performance as value investing has regained favor.
With an expense ratio of 0.20%, it offers low-cost access to enhanced value strategies. Watch for continued value outperformance if economic growth accelerates in 2026.
This fund maintains a concentrated portfolio of 30 to 40 large-cap growth companies with strong competitive moats.
Putnam has shown recent improvements in active management performance, and this fund's high-conviction approach demonstrates true active management.
With an expense ratio of 0.55%, it's positioned for quality growth companies with pricing power in potentially inflationary environments.
| Company | Number of ETFs | Number of stock exchanges | Total trading options | ETF commissions | Inactivity fee | Minimum deposit | Withdrawal flat fee |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TradeStation | 3,000+ | 10 | 10000 - 3,000+ - 10 | $0 | $10 per month (free if account meets minimum activity) | $1 | $25 (for wire transfers, domestic ACH withdrawals are free) |
| Robinhood | 2000 | 5000 - 2000 | $0 | $0 | $1 | $0 | |
| Acorns | 7 | Around 100 - 7 | $0 | $0 | $5 | $0 |
Actively managed funds charge an average of 0.57% versus just 0.058% for passive funds, a gap that compounds dramatically over time.
Over 30 years, $10,000 invested at 10% annual returns grows to $165,223 with 0.20% fees but only $115,582 with 1.50% fees, a 43% difference in final wealth.
Beyond expense ratios, hidden costs lurk:
Research confirms funds in the cheapest quintile succeeded 31% of the time over 10 years versus just 17% for the priciest funds. Fees represent a mathematical headwind active managers must overcome before delivering any excess returns.
Want to dive deeper? We have a dedicated page about actively managed index fund fees where you can explore this topic in detail.
Identifying successful active managers before they outperform is extraordinarily difficult. Past performance is a poor predictor of future results, with fewer than 5% of top-half performers remaining there four years later.
However, certain characteristics correlate with better outcomes:
Active ETFs represent a structural evolution in how active management is delivered to investors. A record 962 new active ETFs launched in 2025, representing 85% of all ETF launches for the year. For the first time, the number of active ETFs now exceeds the number of passive ETFs.
Active ETFs reached $1.47 trillion in assets under management, representing 11% of total ETF assets. They captured $459 billion in flows during 2025, about 31% of all net new ETF flows. Global active ETF AUM is projected to more than double to at least $4 trillion by 2030.
The structural advantages are compelling:
There is one constraint, though: unlike mutual funds that can close to new investors when assets threaten strategy execution, ETFs cannot restrict new investors, potentially forcing managers to compromise concentrated or less-liquid strategies as assets grow.
Many asset managers are converting existing mutual funds to ETF structures, a trend that continues to accelerate.
Active ETFs represent the future of active management, combining professional management with the structural advantages of ETF vehicles. Consider active ETFs over traditional mutual funds when both options exist, given the tax efficiency and cost advantages.
Warren Buffett has been remarkably consistent in his recommendation for most investors: skip active funds. His famous quote says it all: "By periodically investing in an index fund, the know-nothing investor can actually out-perform most investment professionals."
Buffett has consistently recommended low-cost S&P 500 index funds for most investors since his 1993 shareholder letter.
In 2020, he stated: "For most people, the best thing to do is to own the S&P 500 index fund." His will specifies that money left to his wife should be invested 90% in a low-cost S&P 500 index fund and 10% in short-term government bonds, demonstrating his conviction.
Buffett also observed the challenge of identifying skilled managers in advance: "The probability is also very high that the person soliciting your funds will not be the exception who does well."
Michael Hiltzik from the Los Angeles Times wrote: "The debate isn't really about whether index funds perform better than actively managed funds, that debate is essentially over, and indexing wins, hands down."
Barry Ritholtz adds perspective on behavioral benefits: "Indexing gives you a better chance to be less stupid," emphasizing that passive investing helps investors avoid costly mistakes.
Even these advocates acknowledge that a small percentage of active managers do outperform, but identifying them in advance remains extraordinarily difficult.
The consensus among investment professionals favors passive investing for most investors, while acknowledging the nuances and exceptions.
For most categories, especially large-cap equity, the evidence says no. Only about 8% of large-cap active managers beat their average passive rival over the decade through 2025.
However, certain categories show better results. Fixed-income actively managed funds have a 42% success rate over 10 years, making a stronger case for active management in bonds. Small-cap and emerging markets also show higher success rates than large-cap.
The key is evaluating each fund individually based on its Active Share (above 80%), expense ratio (in the cheapest quintile for its category), manager tenure (seven-plus years), and track record.
Even with careful selection, recognize that the odds favor passive investing for most investors and most asset classes.
The best actively managed mutual funds depend on your investment goals, time horizon, and category preferences. Funds with strong 10-year track records include:
These funds share common traits: high Active Share, experienced management, reasonable fees, and consistent processes. Remember that past performance doesn't guarantee future results.
You can buy or sell actively managed mutual funds once per day at the closing NAV (net asset value), calculated after markets close at 4:00 PM Eastern Time.
Keep this in mind:
This differs from stocks and ETFs that trade continuously throughout the day.
Trades settle on a T+1 basis, meaning proceeds are available the next business day. Many funds impose short-term trading fees if you sell within 30 to 90 days to discourage market timing.
You can place orders through brokerage accounts, directly with fund companies, or through retirement plans like 401(k)s.
Taxes significantly impact actively managed mutual fund returns, especially in taxable accounts. High portfolio turnover (often 100% annually) creates frequent taxable events.
When managers sell securities at a profit, the fund distributes capital gains to shareholders, creating tax obligations even if you don't sell your shares. Short-term capital gains (on securities held less than one year) are taxed as ordinary income at rates up to 37%, while long-term gains are taxed at preferential rates up to 20%.
Even in down years, over 42% of active funds distributed capital gains. This tax drag can significantly reduce after-tax returns. Active ETFs offer a structural advantage here through in-kind redemptions that minimize capital gains distributions.
The largest actively managed mutual funds include:
That being said, size doesn't guarantee performance and can actually hinder nimbleness, making it harder to find enough attractive investments without moving markets.
Yes, but only in specific situations and categories. The data shows that actively managed funds have better odds of outperforming in certain areas:
The keys to finding the ones worth it: look for expense ratios in the cheapest quintile (31% success rate vs 17% for the priciest), Active Share above 80%, and managers with seven-plus years of tenure. But for most investors in most situations, low-cost index funds remain the better bet for core portfolio holdings.
The evidence overwhelmingly favors passive investing, with roughly 79% of actively managed funds underperforming or closing over 10 years. However, active management isn't entirely without merit, it just requires careful, evidence-based selection.
When active management has better odds: fixed-income, real estate, small-cap, and emerging markets show more promise than large-cap U.S. equity. The SPIVA mid-year 2025 scorecard showed that only 25% of mid-cap and 22% of small-cap active funds underperformed their benchmarks, a bright spot for active management.
Success depends on low fees, high Active Share (above 80%), experienced management, and concentrated portfolios.
A practical approach: Build your core portfolio with low-cost index funds for broad market exposure, then consider selective active allocations only in categories where evidence supports their potential. Any active fund should meet strict criteria and represent a minority of your overall portfolio.
Active ETFs offer advantages over traditional mutual funds, especially tax efficiency in taxable accounts, while mutual funds' once-daily trading and potential redemption fees make them better suited for long-term investors.
While careful analysis can help identify the minority of active funds worth considering, success isn't guaranteed. Many investors achieve better outcomes by simply indexing their entire portfolio.
Do you have a question about this topic? Ask the community.
Email confirmed — your comment appears after review.
That link expired. Post your comment again.
Anonymous
Financial expert · Financer
Compare stock brokers
from $0 min. deposit
9 options
11 min readInvest
9 min readInvest
8 min readInvest
5 min readInvest
8 min readInvest
Join *Financer Stacks* - Your weekly guide to mastering money basics, stacking extra income, and creating a life where money works for you.